CJC-1295 (DAC / No-DAC) vs Ipamorelin

CJC-1295 and Ipamorelin are the two halves of the most common growth-hormone-releasing peptide stack. CJC-1295 is a GHRH analog; Ipamorelin is a ghrelin-mimetic (GHRP). Together they amplify the pituitary GH pulse - but they are very different molecules and should each be verified independently.

CJC-1295 (DAC / No-DAC)Ipamorelin
ClassGHRH analogGHRP / ghrelin mimetic
Amino acid length30 aa (CJC-1295)5 aa
Molecular weight~3367 Da (no-DAC) / ~3647 Da (DAC)~711 Da
Half-life~30 min (no-DAC) / 6-8 days (DAC)~2 hours
GH release patternSustained baseline (DAC) or pulsed (no-DAC)Sharp pulse
Cortisol / prolactin effectMinimalMinimal (cleanest GHRP)
Typical research dose100 mcg per pulse (no-DAC) / 1-2 mg weekly (DAC)100-300 mcg per pulse
Identity (LC-MS) expected mass3367 / 3647 Da~711 Da
Purity benchmark≥ 97%≥ 98%
Common mislabel riskDAC vs No-DAC swapped on labelSubstituted with cheaper GHRP-2/GHRP-6

Verdict

Stacking CJC-1295 with Ipamorelin combines a sustained GHRH signal with a clean GH pulse. Most blends sold in Australia are pre-mixed at a 2:1 mg ratio. The two biggest QC failures we see are (a) DAC vs No-DAC mis-labelling on the CJC vial and (b) Ipamorelin being substituted with GHRP-2 or GHRP-6, which both raise prolactin/cortisol. An LC-MS identity test catches both within hours.

Frequently asked questions

Should I buy them pre-blended or separate?

Pre-blended is more convenient and what most AU vendors sell. Separate vials let you adjust ratio and test each component independently - which is what we recommend for any first order from a new vendor.

Is DAC or No-DAC better?

DAC (Drug Affinity Complex) extends half-life to 6-8 days for once-weekly dosing. No-DAC requires multiple daily pulses but produces a more physiological GH profile.

Can a single LabDoc test cover the blend?

Yes - LabDoc reports identity and purity for each peptide present in a blended vial on a single CoA.